LA City Council saves Marilyn Monroe’s Brentwood home from demolition (2024)

Fans of Marilyn Monroe are breathing a sigh of relief after learning that the Hollywood icon’s former home on the Westside of Los Angeles, where she died of a drug overdose in 1962 at age 36, will not be demolished.

That decision came down to a 12-0 vote by the L.A. City Council on Wednesday, June 26, following months of uncertainty about the fate of Monroe’s final residence.

The Spanish-style house at 12305 Fifth Helena Drive in Brentwood is owned by real estate heiress Brinah Milstein and her husband, producer Roy Bank. The couple, which also owns the house next door, purchased the Monroe house for $8.35 million and planned to demolish it to expand their property.

But last September, a day after the city issued the owners a demolition permit, the City Council passed a motion seeking to have the house declared a historic-cultural monument. That vote effectively prohibited demolition until the city decided whether to designate the home a historic-cultural landmark – a label that would save it from the wrecking ball.

The effort to preserve the 1920s-era home was led by City Councilmember Traci Park, who represents the Westside including Brentwood. Her office received hundreds of calls from people pleading that the city save the home from demolition, she said last fall.

On Wednesday, Park said that no other person or place in L.A. is as iconic as Monroe or her Brentwood home.

“To lose this piece of history – the only home that Marilyn Monroe ever owned – would be a devastating blow for historic preservation and for a city where less than 3% of historic designations are associated with women’s heritage,” the councilmember said.

Park also said that she and her staff worked closely with the property’s owners on the idea of moving the house to another location so the public could see and visit the home, but an agreement has not yet been reached.

“I remain hopeful and committed to working with the property owners to see if this can be done in the future,” she said. “But today, let’s preserve this essential piece of L.A.’s history and culture.”

Peter C. Sheridan, an attorney for the property owners, refuted Park’s claims of working closely with his clients, saying in a statement after the vote that Parks and her staff had been unresponsive.

“Ms. Park has ignored the fact that her constituents — civic and homeowner’s groups in the community — are adamantly against the designation of the home,” Sheridan stated. “Ms. Park has also ignored that the city granted dozens of permits to over 14 different prior owners to change the home through numerous remodels, resulting in there being nothing left reflecting Ms. Monroe’s brief time there 60 years ago.”

He called the city council’s vote “another step in an admittedly biased, unconstitutional and rigged process, as set forth in the owners’ lawsuit” against the city.

In the past several months, supporters and opponents of the historic-cultural designation have weighed in on the issue.

Jacques Le Roux, an art and culture historian from Paris, wrote to city officials that Monroe had attained “the rarest of status: that of a global world icon.”

“That transition started in that precise house on the night of her passing and this makes the building a very special place, historically, culturally and symbolically,” he wrote. “Not protecting the site — that would lead to its destruction — would be an irreparable mistake and a crime against our common memory and heritage.”

But some homeowner groups including Brentwood Homeowners Association, Brentwood Park Property Owners Association and Mandeville Canyon Association wrote to city officials opposing the historic designation. They cited safety and disruptions from tourists flocking in, although the home is behind a privacy gate and can’t be seen from the street.

Earlier this year, Brentwood resident Gary Hampar raised concerns in written comments, saying,“The neighborhood is up in arms about this and strongly opposes this nomination be designated as a Historic Cultural Monument. It will merely generate tour bus activity and looky-loos who will want to tour a site where an unfortunate and sordid event occurred” — referencing Monroe’s fatal drug overdose.

To address nearby residents’ concerns, Park introduced a motion Wednesday to ask the city’s transportation department to evaluate restricting tour buses on parts of Helena Drive and surrounding streets. She also pledged to continue working with the community to address any future concerns.

In an interview after the vote, Park said she’s talked with the property owners a handful of times and she reiterated that she remained “hopeful that those conversations will continue.”

Park declined to go into details about what’s been discussed, citing pending litigation by the owners of the former Monroe home.

Meanwhile, following Wednesday’s vote, historic preservationists and Monroe fans said they were thrilled by the council’s decision to save the late Hollywood star’s house.

Kim Cooper and her husband offer walking tours in L.A. through their company, Esotouric. Their tours don’t include the Monroe house, but Cooper said she understands people’s fascination with the pop culture icon who endured a difficult childhood yet found success by putting a “playful, intelligent spin on the ‘dumb blonde.’”

“The love people feel for her is very real and very strong,” Cooper said.

She added, “You can tell there are people all over the world … (who, if) they never see the house, just knowing it exists makes them feel something.”

City News Service contributed reporting.